The Pentagon has already declared World War  III and President Barack Obama and the Congress never even carried out their  constitutional duties to approve the use of American military power for  war.
 One might reasonably conclude that the United States has outsourced war.  Presently, World War III is being conducted on two continents – Asia and Africa  – with two others – Europe and South America – looming on the horizon. Today,  wars are crafted by the upper one percent of wealthy elitists who, using  non-governmental organizations, television networks, non — profit “think tanks,”  and public relations firms, can declare war on nations without a whimper from  elected public officials.
 Symmetric warfare is no longer an option for the global elites. World Wars I  and II severely affected the investments of many of the global elite families as  a result of the destruction of cities, factories, railways, seaports, and other  infrastructures. The Korean, Vietnam, the Arab-Israeli, and Iraq wars were messy  affairs that also adversely affected markets and destroyed valuable  infrastructures. The Cold War never developed into a hot nuclear war because of  the doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD), which ensured that a nuclear  first strike by either the West or the East would result in total annihilation  of both sides, along with the rest of the world. Even a western military attack  on China would have had disastrous results for the attackers, especially since  China could retaliate with a nuclear counter-attack and wipe out the U.S.  Seventh Fleet and its East Asian naval bases, including Okinawa and Guam. A new  type of warfare was required by the elites: asymmetric warfare – the use of  unconventional warfare tactics, including information warfare, by proxies,  non-state actors, agents provocateur, and fifth columns.
 Largely financed by hedge fund mega-tycoon George Soros and his Central  Intelligence Agency interlocutors, our present asymmetric World War III was  field tested just like any new product. The “themed” revolutions were  market-tested first in Serbia, and then in Ukraine, Georgia, and Kyrgyzstan, to  oust problematic governments that did not want to get on board with the dictates  of the unelected and unaccountable real controllers of the financial and  political destiny of the world.
 Pro-western and pro-European Union governments, comprised of a number of  individuals who were funded by Soros and other non-state operations established  by the global elites, for example, the Council on Foreign Relations, the  Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission, Freedom House, U.S. Institute of  Peace, and others funded and supported by the Houses of Rothschild, Rockefeller,  Mellon, and others saw to it that new governments took root in Belgrade, Kiev,  Tbilisi, and Bishkek. These new governments were not elected but took power as a  result of themed street rebellions, a new manifestation of unconventional  warfare. 
 No longer did armies, navies, and air forces have to face each other across  battlefields and battle zones and theaters of warfare. One merely had to embed  fifth columnists and provocateurs inside a targeted nation's capital city,  media, political party apparatus, and "civil society" infrastructure to bring  about the defeat of the government outside the normal political process and  replace it with a new government beholden to the desires of the central banks  and global oligarchs.
 The beginnings of the asymmetric world war began in Belgrade, Serbia when  Otpor – a Serbian resistance movement dedicated to overthrowing the Slobodon  Milosevic regime – launched the first “themed revolution.” Otpor’s symbol was a  clenched fist, an emblem that would reappear in the future in other capital  cities from Kiev to Cairo. Otpor received massive funding from a network of  western contrivances, including George Soros’s Open Society Institute, the  neo-conservative-infiltrated U.S. National Endowment for Democracy, and various  European Union-funded NGOs that were intimately linked to Soros’s “democracy  engineering” operations.
 The playbook used for Otpor in Serbia and by similar organizations in  toppling the governments of Georgia in the Rose Revolution, Ukraine in the  Orange Revolution, and Kyrgyzstan in the Tulip Revolution, was developed by  University of Massachusetts professor Gene Sharp, the founder of the  Boston-based NGO, the Albert Einstein Institute, which helped train Otpor  activists in civil disobedience and popular resistance campaigns designed to  overthrow governments, those democratically-elected and those not. Albert  Einstein Institute-trained provocateurs launched popular resistance campaigns  around the world aimed at replacing governments unwilling to acquiesce to the  dictates of Western elites. Internal opposition forces, all acolytes of Sharp,  for instance Kmara, which helped install the pro-Western and pro-Israeli Mikheil  Saakashvili in Georgia; Pora in Ukraine that propelled pro-NATO Viktor  Yushchenko into the presidency; and KelKel in Kyrgyzstan that replaced Askar  Akayev with the corrupt Kurmanbek Bakiyev. 
 The domino effect of the themed revolutions saw Serbs helping to overthrow  the Georgian government, then Serbs and Georgians flocking to Kiev to oust the  Ukrainian government, and Georgians and Ukrainians being directly involved in  the insurrection in Bishkek. The neo-conservatives and Sharp had borrowed a page  from the Communists and the international proletarian movement that saw  Communist cadres fight against capitalists and fascists in foreign civil wars,  for example, the Spanish Civil War and conflicts in Africa and Southeast  Asia.
 Sharp was an alumnus of Harvard University’s CIA-linked Center for  International Affairs, also abbreviated “CIA,” which is not coincidental.  Harvard and the CIA of Langley, Virginia have long maintained a close  relationship. In fact, Sharp was never interested in ensuring the will of the  people to map out their own future but was putting into practice the theory of  asymmetric warfare – the vanquishing of enemies through the use of proxy  internal forces without the requirement for invading foreign armies and the  massive death and destruction associated with such action.
 Many of Sharp’s tactics have been seen in practice in many asymmetric warfare  targets. These include the creation of a perception of a successful movement,  even if there is not one. The use of western-controlled news networks like Fox  News that showed a video clip of anti-austerity Greek rioters in Athens falsely  depicted as anti-government protesters in Moscow and Al Jazeera’s use of a video  erroneously showing a U.S.- and Saudi-backed bloody crackdown of pro-democracy  protesters by Bahrain’s security forces as the bloody repression of protesters  by Syria’s government are examples of Sharp’s propaganda and disinformation  tactics.
 Cultivating foreign support is another key element of Sharp’s asymmetric  warfare tactics. The virtual control exercised by Soros over Human Rights Watch  after the multi-billionaire hedge fund kingpin donated $100 million to the group  is a case in point. The human rights NGO was at the forefront of hyping  “atrocities” committed by the Qaddafi regime in Libya but remained largely  silent on Libyan rebel atrocities committed against Libyan and African blacks,  as well as Qaddafi loyalists. In so doing, Human Rights Watch had a powerful  accomplice in the International Criminal Court, which tended to look the other  way when CIA- and Saudi- and Qatari’ supported Libyan rebels were committing the  massacres.
 Another Sharp tactic is to seek change outside the electoral system. This  tactic was evident in the 2004 Orange Revolution in Ukraine, where election  results were rejected, and in the recent Russian parliamentary election, where  Soros- and U.S. neocon-financed election monitoring groups like Golos rejected  the outcome of the election and used shills like former Soviet President Mikhail  Gorbachev to call for the nullification of the election. Interference following  the Sharp and Soros methodology can also be seen in the presidential candidacies  of Russian oligarch and New Jersey Nets basketball owner Mikhail Prokhorov and  the backing by western propaganda outlets like the Christian Science Monitor  (now derided as the “Christian Zionist Monitor” after its takeover by interests  who favor a neo-imperialist U.S. foreign policy) of Moscow street protest  veteran Alexei Navalny.
 Sharp and Soros are on the same page in calling for the internal opposition  forces’ use of the Internet, fax, and social networks like Facebook and Twitter  to advance their agendas. 
 In the next phases of World War III, the asymmetric warriors of the Pentagon  and their adjunct non-state actors will continue to turn up the heat in the Arab  World, with the revolutions in Libya, Syria, Tunisia, Yemen, and Egypt, after a  somewhat shaky start that saw the advancement of Islamist groups, being brought  under more western and NATO control. Russia’s presidential election and a  turndown in the Chinese economy, with growing village-based dissent among  China’s growing middle class, will present further opportunities for the  promoters of World War III. The sudden death of North Korea’s leader Kim Jong Il  has also resulted in a call for an expansion of social networking operations,  most notably by the CIA- and Soros-infested Washington Post, inside Asia’s  hermit kingdom. 
 Myanmar, China’s restive provinces of Tibet and East Turkestan, Lebanon,  Iran, Algeria, Sudan, Zimbabwe, Venezuela, Nepal, Belarus, Ecuador, Bolivia,  Pakistan, Laos, and the two Congos also present opportunities for the World War  III architects. Those who seek to extend American and global elitist control  over the entire planet will not rest until every acre of land comes under the  firm control of the oligarchs of Wall Street, the spymasters of the CIA, and the  globalist business cartels and families.
  Courtesy: Wayne MADSEN (USA) 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
0 comments:
Post a Comment